Vanguard · where almost everything starts
Who do you test a decision against when everyone with an opinion has something to gain?
I have a call to make this week and almost everyone with an opinion has something to gain from the answer.
A written one-page verdict: what you are looking at, what has to be decided and what the next step is.
The four conditions
Ninety minutes, one page, 48 hours.
Fixed fee
Never by the hour. What you pay for is the verdict, not the time it takes to get to it. You are told the amount in the 25-minute call, in writing, before you book.
Credited back
It is credited in full against any engagement you sign within the next 90 days.
Refund
If at the end of the session you find that the real question was a different one and it went unanswered, the fee is refunded in full. You are the judge of that.
Always the founder
Whoever decides with you is the one who delivers. There is no team to bring up to speed and no junior who bounces the question back to you.
Before you book, without hiring anyone
The three conditions that make a decision worth a session. If you do not meet all three yet, it is not the moment for a session: start with the 25-minute call, which costs nothing.
- It is already touching you. There is a move that has already reached your operation or your contract, not a curiosity and not a topic of conversation.
- You decide. There is someone with the authority and the budget who has to resolve the matter.
- The stakes are real. There is something real at stake in either direction: money, continuity, regulation, reputation or opportunity. What gets lost by not acting counts too.
Before booking anything: write your question in a single sentence. If it does not fit in one sentence, it is not yet a decision, it is several. Separate them and order them by which one blocks the others.
How the verdict is reached
The method, not the promise.
- You write the question in one sentence and send up to twenty pages of context.
- It gets read before the session. The ninety minutes are not spent bringing anyone up to speed.
- In the session, the first thing examined is whether the question is the right one. Often it is not, and that changes the entire decision.
- What is decision gets separated from what is execution, and the second gets set aside.
- The verdict gets written afterwards, not on the call, and arrives within 48 hours.
What the page you receive looks like
This sounds like you if
- The proposal carries a return case built on the vendor's assumptions.
- The board wants a position and the available material was produced by an interested party.
- The people who could weigh in internally are either selling you something or reporting to you.
The proof that applies here
- 19 years across HPE, IBM and Citi, from engineer to regional operations leadership.
- Two corporate products taken to the Gartner Magic Quadrant.
- Eight years under regulatory supervision without a single audit finding.
Before you hire
Ninety minutes buy you judgment on what you describe, not an assessment of your operation.
One person is exactly what you are buying: there is no team to bring up to speed and no junior who bounces the question back to you. What gets signed on that page is signed by the person who answers for it.
Can you write the decision you are facing in a single sentence?
If the problem is a different one
The business case was built by the person selling it to me.
Investment verdict
The integrator says it works and I am the one who signs.
Independent implementation review
The financial diligence is done. Nobody looked at whether the operation survives the day after.
Technology and operations due diligence
