The seat · present in all three doors
Who runs technology when the company cannot yet justify a full-time CTO?
I need technology judgment every week, not a project.
A written mandate: what the role decides, who it answers to, and what stays behind when it ends.
Also searched for as part-time CTO, interim CTO or fractional CTO services.
First, before you read any further
Few mandates, on purpose.
Mandates are limited and selective: never more than two at a time. And if the company is in a position to hire a full-time CTO, it should, and we will say so.
The firm holds two mandates at a time at most, and that is not a courtesy: it is the shape of the product. If we say yes, it is because the seat is open.
Where this fits
Three heights of the same seat.
What changes between the three is not the size of the package. It is who fills it, and with what mandate.
Before anything gets signed
The six questions a leadership mandate has to answer before it is signed. They work just as well if the role is filled internally, and they are the difference between direction and expensive advice:
- Which decisions this role makes alone, which it consults, and which it only recommends.
- Who it answers to, board or general management, and how often.
- Up to what amount it can commit budget.
- Who reports to it and who does not.
- What has to be in place the day the mandate ends.
- What the company does when the role and the internal team disagree.
The sixth is the one that almost always goes unwritten. It is the one that decides whether the arrangement survives its first disagreement.
How the seat gets taken
- The mandate is agreed in writing before anything starts. Without it there is no seat, only an opinion.
- The real state of the function is established: open decisions, standing vendor commitments, and what holds the operation up today.
- Direction is set and the portfolio is ranked against the team's real capacity, not against the wish list.
- The existing team is led, and investment and vendor decisions are made within the agreed limit.
- What must remain is installed: the decisions, the structure, and the judgment behind them.
What stays in place when the mandate ends
- The written mandate, stating what the role decides and who it answers to.
- Technology direction with the portfolio ranked against real capacity.
- Investment and vendor decisions made, with the reasoning that holds them up.
- The team led, and that judgment installed in whoever stays.
This sounds like you if
- The business grew into needing technology leadership and cannot yet justify a full-time one.
- A subsidiary inherited the group's technical obligations without the leadership behind them.
- The CTO left and the search for the next one will take months.
The proof that applies here
- Operations leadership of more than 150 people across eleven groups, with regional budget ownership.
- Eight years answering to a financial regulator without a single finding.
- Two products taken to the Gartner Magic Quadrant, with product and market decisions, not only technical ones.
What it is and what it is not
This is not advisory under another name. It is the function: decisions made, vendors chosen, team led, and someone accountable to the board. Whoever takes the seat has held it before with more than 150 people and budget ownership.
The person who listens, the person who leads and the person who signs are the same person.
Which technology decision has been waiting months for someone with the authority to make it?
If the problem is a different one
The decisions that weigh most, I make without an independent peer in the room.
Operations counsel
In the committee nobody contradicts the person presenting, and the people who know work for him.
Independent committee advisor
We know that if it goes down, it goes down. No one has wanted to write what happens next.
Operational readiness diagnostic
