Services· Automation and agents·How do I make sure it holds on the bad day?
Forge · Build
What do you do when something built in a week is already holding up a process?
We built it with AI in a week, it worked, and now the whole operation uses it.
What got built fast, taken into production: secured, with a tested backup, a named owner and the code in a repository of your own.
AI-Built Software RescueSend this page to whoever decides
What you receive
- The application stabilized, with a tested restore and the secrets out of the code.
- The code in a repository of your own, with its change history.
- The verdict per application: rescue, rebuild or switch off, with its argument.
- The operating manual, the named owner and the cost of keeping it running.
The proof that applies here
- Operations leadership over 60,000 servers, where no change went through without a tested recovery.
How we solve it
The method, not the promise.
- It gets stabilized first: a tested restore, secrets out of the code and role based access. The operation does not wait for the full diagnosis.
- The code gets moved to a repository in your name, under version control.
- What was generated gets reviewed where it tends to fail: authentication, permissions, input data and dependencies.
- A decision gets made per application, with the argument written down: rescue, rebuild or switch off.
- It gets handed over with tests on the flows that matter, an operating manual, a named owner and the three year cost of keeping it running.
Use this today, without hiring anyone
Five checks you can run in an afternoon on any application built with AI assistants. You do not need to know how to code, you need access:
- Where the code lives. If it only exists inside the tool it was built with, export a copy today to a repository your organization owns. It is the check that protects the most and costs the least.
- Where the keys are. Search the code for passwords and service keys typed in by hand. Every one that shows up there is known to anyone who can see the code.
- Who can get into what. Try to open the admin screens with a user that has no permissions. Things built fast often check the permission on the screen and not on the server.
- When the last restore happened. Not the last backup: the last time something was actually restored. If never, that is this week's test.
- Who brings it back on a Monday at eight. By name. If there is no name, that is the first finding.
The first two get fixed in a day. The other three decide whether the application can keep growing.
This sounds like you if
- Someone on your team vibe coded it and it turned out better than expected.
- The application went from ten users to two hundred and every change breaks something else.
- Whoever built it moved to another role and the process still depends on it.
Before you hire
We rescue what already holds up a process, or what you have decided to take into production. If the verdict is to rebuild, you get it with the cost of both options side by side.
The way of building is new; what breaks when an application grows is not. This is led by someone whose career was operating what other people built. That is why the deliverable is not just corrected code: it is an application with an owner, a backup and a known cost.
If that application stopped working tomorrow, who brings it back, and where do they get the code?
In the cycle
If the problem is a different one
The areas built their applications with AI and the person who made them left in March.
Self built software debt
We run it in a spreadsheet and no product on the market does exactly this.
Custom operational application
We have the AI licenses, and my team is busy keeping what already exists running.
Forward Deployed Engineers
